top of page

Rahm Emanuel Stirs the Pot

  • scottyv6
  • Feb 4
  • 1 min read

| Jonathan Alter | Washington Monthly |


I’d go to ranked [choice] voting. The reason you need ranked voting is that it opens up the discussion to voters who don’t vote in primaries. [RCV is used in Alaska and Maine but was rejected in 2024 in Arizona, Idaho, Colorado, and Missouri].


Opens up debate and dialogue


One thing I’ve said to the DNC is this: New Hampshire allows moderate independents and Republicans to vote in its primary. My view is that this should be a standard for being one of the first ten states. If unaffiliated independents are 50 percent of the electorate, maybe you say, come on, let’s go to the dance together. Because if the primary decides who you’re going to nominate and you’re not thinking about the general election, that’s not strategic.


One way or another, I’m thinking the Democratic Party either goes to ranked voting, which opens up debate and dialogue to voters who don’t get addressed until it’s too late, or changes primaries across the country so those [independent] voters actually get a chance to show up, be heard, and be counted.


Recent Posts

See All
Push On For Ranked-Choice Voting

Steve Winter & Alden Okoh-Aduako seek to give New Haven voters more ballot options, as they advocate for passage of "enabling" state bill.

 
 

Comments


Commenting on this post isn't available anymore. Contact the site owner for more info.
bottom of page